Body Beast - Build: Legs Review
Printable PDF Body Beast Workout Sheets to track your Body Beast workouts. These are much .. Fat Girl Meets Fit World: Body Beast: Beast Phase Body Builder Meal Plan, · Body Builder Meal .. Get Healthy U | Chris Freytag · • HEALTH. Home» A week of hard labor» Body Beast Worksheets Hey everyone, the Beast worksheets are now available and will be a continuing work in progress. One sunny day Oscar the Caterpillar meets Bob the Monarch Butterfly. Bob tells Oscar that one day he, too, will have wings! Grade 1. 09/06/13; 2 FILES icon-.
The authors are showing that if a child is obedient and good then they will surely receive a reward in the end. There are many attributes of an adult-centered text that this story has which contributes to the conservative nature of the text. This text is extremely conservative and adult-centered in various ways. This fairytale encompasses some of the topics we have discussed in class.
It not only is incredibly child centered, but it also is progressive. The Grimm brothers depicted both Hansel and Grethel as smart, capable people. As Hansel dropped pebble after pebble on the road to help them find their way home, the wife noticed that he consistently looked back at the house. Therefore, his plan worked and he and his sister are able to find their way home after being left in the woods. By, having the ability to outsmart the adults, Hansel proved to have a great amount of agency.
He not only had the courage to secretly plot against them, but also managed to trick them into believing he was just a childish boy fantasizing about his cat. His lie about the cat is significant because it shows that he understands adults have these assumptions that children are childlike in their thinking. Grethel also had her moment of greatness when she tricked the witch. Smartly, Grethel told the old witch she did not understand how to get in the oven.
Ultimately, the witch was engulfed in flames resulting in her ruin. Like Hansel, Grethel is depicted as a stronger, smarter character than the adults, especially the witch, within this fairytale. Both children easily trick the adults. In addition, they have the power to find their way through the woods at the end of the story with no pebbles or bread to guide them. The two children truly have an enormous amount of agency as they not only can outsmart the adults, but also can manipulate nature to help them.
It is as if Hansel and Grethel gain more confidence, and agency as they manipulate and conquer every obstacle crossing their path. Another example of why this text is child-centered is how the adults are depicted.
First, it is important to note that it is only the children who have names. In addition, the adults are all portrayed as selfish, weak, and evil. The wild animals would soon come and tear them to pieces! Then we must all four die of hunger, thou mayest as well plane the planks for our coffins.
The father barely stood up for his children, and let his wife send them to their deaths. He merely gave into her, even though it was clear that he loved his children dearly. Although he is a good character, he has no power to stand up for what he believed and felt strongly for.
Therefore, it is apparent, that all three adults in this story are perceived as evil or weak, making this a truly child-centered text.
She believed that they could never locate their way out of the woods because they were mere children, and would have no adult to guide them.
However, they break these assumptions by finding their way through the forest not once, but twice. This is extremely progressive, because it challenges some of the stereotypical assumptions about childhood. Children are often thought of as very dependent on their parents and innocent; however, Hansel and Grethel clearly do not need their parents to find their way.
In fact, the children not only found their way through the confusing woods and saved themselves from the horrid witch, but they also saved their father. In a more conservative text the father would have been the savior; however, it is Hansel and Grethel who hold all the power and save the day. It challenges assumptions about children, and gives children a great amount of agency. Hansel and Grethel are depicted as capable strong characters, whereas the adults are seen as evil and weak.
The children also reject the norms of childhood that suggest life for a child is simple and fun, as they understand their lives are complex, and they work hard to control the situations around them. By there same token, there are certain things that are expected of a girl to maintain her societal femininity.
From a young age, we are lead to believe that boys are the dominant, more powerful sex. Females are portrayed as care takers and are often seen as being more compassionate and caring then males are. Men are expected to rougher and less sensitive. The men are expected to work hard to bring home money to support their families. Females are often portrayed as being more in touch with their emotions.
None of these ideas applies to any one person any more so then do personality traits, but our society interpellates these ideas into our minds every minute of every day. The following passage is from my paper on the Goonies, in which I highlight some examples of the interpellation typical female and male roles in this movie. The boys seem to be portrayed in the usual ways, as being mischievous and thrill seeking, while the girls are shown as weak and scared.
The oldest girl, Andy, seems more concerned with her crush throughout the movie then she does with finding the gold and taking an active role in the adventure. There is a point in the movie where Mikey tells Andy that she may want to hold his hand because it was dark up ahead and it may be dangerous.
This is another example of the girls and the guys being put into common roles that society has created for them. As we have been told since we were young children through fairy tales and everyday life, men are supposed to take care of females and be there to protect them. This statement reaffirms the idea of interpellation of typical male and female roles in this film.
The developers son is driving a convertible and wearing his letter jacket and has two girls in his car, while Brent is wearing ratty old sweats and is riding his little brothers bike. Interpellation is shown in the idea that the rich kids are cool and popular, while the poor kids are unpopular and outcasts. At the end of the movie, when the family realizes they have enough money to save their home, they come together and hug each other and really show affection towards each other for the first time in the movie.
Again, interpellation is shown in that money and material things bring happiness. Children who are born into wealth and privilege are showcased in reality television and documentaries, further rubbing our noses in the fact that there are parents who can provide for their children in ways that you or I could never imagine from a material standpoint. Our culture seems to go out of its way to display this quality, to make those who have more feel better about themselves and those who have less feel worse.
I think this reoccurring theme is strong in the Goonies. As described in the excerpt Mikeys family is portrayed as poor and unhappy. The rich family holds the happiness of the poor family in its hands.
The rich family has all of the agency while the poor family has none. Like in our society, the poor are at the mercy of the rich.
Body Remodel: Body Beast Worksheets
They want to keep power in the hands of those who have always had it, and usually on of the only ways to do that is to interpellate society to believe that that is where the power and authority belong in the first place. In fact, I always hated princesses and pink for that matter. Below are some detailed examples of interpellation that I found in this particular version of the story: He is stopped along the way by a strange old man. The picture of the old man in this story is interesting because the old man is dressed rather uniquely.
I think that this shows interpellation because it shows that strange people dress differently from normal people. In the United Stateswe assert ourselves and are identity at first impression, based solely on our clothing.
Like I said in the paper, distinctions between strange and normal are made all of the time based on clothing. If I were to dread lock my hair, someone might look at me and think I was perhaps dirty or unprofessional, when my goal is doing so was only to embrace a low maintenance lifestyle. We make assumptions like the previous constantly, based on appearance alone.Beast Basics [HD]
We are interpellated to believe that we must dress certain ways for certain occasions. After Jack climbs the beanstalk, he finds the giants wife, who just returned from picking flowers. He asks her for something to eat and she says that she will make him something to eat, but that they must be fast because her husband gets home soon.
She is patiently waiting for her husband to get home and is picking flowers to pass the time and she is the one who does all of the cooking for her husband. The wife also seems to be at the mercy of her husband. In the story she invites Jack inside but warns him that her husband likes to eat little boys. Interpellation is shown in the idea that the giant has the control over his wife and her opinion on the welfare of Jack is irrelevant to him.
As soon as the giant gets home, he demands dinner and his wife, who has already had it prepared, brings it to him right away. The female giant seems to act like a servant to her husband; throughout the story he demands things and she brings them for him right away.
It is also interesting that the husband is only concerned with eating, sleeping and money, which is a very typical depiction of males. Kingdom Hearts as a Child-Centered Text In the Playstation 2 game Kingdom Hearts, players are introduced to a young boy named Sora who is thrown into a struggle to save not one, but multiple worlds from a mysterious force known as the Heartless.
Sora finds himself suddenly wielding a magical weapon called the Keyblade, which just happens to be the only thing that can fight the Heartless, and an artifact that Donald Duck and Goofy have been ordered by Mickey Mouse to find.
Sora has a different mission- he is looking for his two best friends, Riku and Kairi, who disappeared when his world was destroyed by the Heartless.
Together, Sora, Donald and Goofy venture to different worlds, meet many other Disney characters, and battle the Heartless in hopes of restoring balance to the worlds. At first, Kingdom Hearts appears to be a light fairy-tale about good fighting evil, but it soon becomes apparent that Sora and childlike characters like Donald and Goofy are dealing with issues not typically found in adult-centered texts, and more importantly, they are doing it without the aid of just, authoritative adults.
The adults in Kingdom Hearts are a far cry from the knowledgeable, caring, strong individuals typically found in adult-centered texts. The first major group of adults consists of the villains from various Disney movies who are working together with the Heartless to take over their worlds.
This group includes such characters as Jafar, Captain Hook and Maleficent, all of which are most likely already infamous to the player for their deeds in their respective films. The game presents them as completely irredeemable- they are evil, corrupt, and will stop at nothing to achieve their goals, even if it means dealing with the mysterious Heartless.
Of course, one by one their plans backfire and they are either defeated by Sora or betrayed by the Heartless, which is a rather adult-centered way of dealing with bad adults. However, the second major group of adults makes up for this.
These characters are the heroes that the villains originally battled- Aladdin, Tarzan and Jack Skellington, for example. Upon arriving in Halloween Townfor example, Sora, Donald and Goofy are shocked to see that Jack has recruited the Heartless in the annual Halloween festival. In addition to these two groups of adults, Kingdom Hearts features adults that appear to be in positions of authority, but in reality have little or no power over children.
In the world of The Little Mermaid, King Triton has lost much of his control over Ariel- the scene where he originally destroys all of her treasures becomes much less devastating in the game, where he only destroys an item that is later revealed to be useless anyway. His mother is heard once at the beginning of the game, where she calls him for dinner, but the same exact scene shows Sora sneaking out of the house through his bedroom window.
Mickey Mouse is the closest thing to a central authority figure the game has because he is the main reason why Donald and Goofy are exploring the worlds, and thus, the reason why Sora is brought along.
We tried making oral antibiotics into intravenous antibiotics. We even got an investigational antibiotic from a pharmaceutical company. An experimental one, a test one. And that also did not work. Desperate to contain the outbreak, the hospital took unprecedented steps. Had monitors here reminding us to wash our hands, built a whole wall up in the other side. We moved every patient in the ICU, completely cleaned it, moved patients back in.
With the hospital in crisis, genetic researchers in building 49 next door were scrambling to figure out how the KPC was spreading. We had now gotten to the point where they were identifying a patient a week, and it was not clear how these patients might be related to each other. Are these all the DNAs then? Each patient had a number. So this shows you, based on the DNA sequences, how we think the bacteria spread throughout the hospital. By matching the DNA, they discovered something none of them knew.
Three, four and eight were all silent carriers. For me, the data were stunning. Why was it stunning? Because it became very clear that we had missed the transmission sequence. And to stop it, they needed to figure out exactly how the KPC was moving through the hospital. Was it on the hands of workers or visitors, or on hospital equipment? And then, as they urgently searched for silent carriers throughout the rest of the hospital, their worst nightmare came true.
The outbreak had spread beyond the ICU. The staff was in a panic. As they looked on helplessly, patients began to die.
We felt responsible for it. We are responsible for the patients. Did you miss something? Did you forget to tell the doctor something? Did I forget to wash my hands between Mr.
Is that why Mrs. There were few options left. Gallin asked me if we needed to close the hospital, or if we needed to close the hospital to admissions. It was a possibility.
- Hunting the Nightmare Bacteria
- Attention Beasts – The Body Beast Mobile App Is Here
- Featured News
Instead, they expanded testing hospital-wide and isolated all those found with KPC. Finally, six months after patient one first arrived, the outbreak subsided almost as suddenly as it had begun. By then, 18 patients had been infected with KPC, and the ultimate tragedy, six people had died from it. Many inside NIH continued to be concerned. Do you think KPC is now gone from your hospital? Using cutting-edge genomics, researchers analyzed infections from nearly 1, patients, and in May announced a startling discovery.
We were surprised, greatly surprised when we found a new type of bacterium that had never been described in great abundance anywhere in the world. This new type is called klebsiella CG, and it can be deadly.
ELA / Literacy Lessons
Has it killed people? People die with this organism sometimes, yes. The rare superbug was found in a third of the samples taken from patients.
And there was a more troubling mystery.
Body Beast – Build: Legs Review
Where did it come from? But probably, many patients brought it into the hospital, and we now know that this is a common organism in our community. The Houston study brings it clear and it puts it there in black and white. The threat of antibiotic resistance is dynamic and ever-evolving. The prospect of life without antibiotics is barely imaginable for a world that has had a cheap and plentiful supply of them since the end of World War II.
They are a staple of modern medicine. Antibiotics are unique drugs. Fifty years from today, the cholesterol drugs we have now will work just as well as they work today.
The cancer drugs we have now will work just as well as they do today. Antibiotics are the only class of drugs that the more we use, the more rapidly we lose. When you use it, it becomes less effective for me, and vice versa. That is the essence of antibiotic resistance. The more you expose a bacteria to an antibiotic, the greater the likelihood that resistance to that antibiotic is going to develop. So the more antibiotics we put into people, we put into the environment, the more opportunities we create for these bacteria to become resistant.
But people forgot about the danger of resistance because the drugs were so effective. And what they had forgotten was the warning that Alexander Fleming himself, the man who discovered penicillin, gave us inthat resistance was already being seen, and the more we wasted penicillin, the more people were going to die of penicillin-resistant infections. Public health officials estimate that one third of all antibiotic use in the U. And it became less obvious that you were able to invent new antibiotics.
And we had nothing coming to treat them. One of the last companies to stay was Pfizer, which had made its name on antibiotics. By the mids, it had set its sights squarely on the Gram-negative problem. We thought there was medical need. And we thought that, given our history in being able to develop penicillin, the anti-fungals, you know, antibiotics, that in fact, if we put our minds to it, that we would succeed.
But this is a highly risky and unpredictable enterprise. Despite the risk, Pfizer built a world-class research team in Groton, Connecticut, and brought in a veteran in Gram-negative research, John Quinn. Inwhen I finished my training, almost every pharmaceutical company had an antibiotic development team.
SAMPLE RESPONSE PAPERS
And by the time I landed at Pfizer inwe were really down to three big guys and some smaller companies, biotechs and so on. And I think all of us felt that, you know, we had a moral obligation to continue to work in this area. There was a pressing clinical need. Most companies had abandoned the field, and we were still in the game. We were proud to still be in the game. Quinn and his team believed they were onto something big, several different compounds to treat Gram-negatives.
The highly resistant Gram-negative bacteria. These would have solved problems and saved lives had they been successfully developed.
But bringing these drugs to market faced the economic paradox of antibiotics. If you need an antibiotic, you need it only briefly. You use it only briefly. You mean it costs up to a billion dollars to bring a new drug to market? It can easily cost up to a billion dollars to bring a new drug to the market. I answer to the shareholders. That was the problem facing Pfizer in Its stock had plummeted on Wall Street, and its blockbuster cholesterol drug, Lipitor, was about to lose its patent.
I received an email on my BlackBerry that there was a mandatory emergency meeting in two hours. So I called in for the meeting and was told that that announcement had been made that the Groton facility was going to be closed. The company ended 70 years of leadership in antibiotic development, leaving its search for a Gram-negative cure unfinished.
We are a capitalist society. Inwe asked Pfizer to explain the decision. These are not ruthless decisions. These are, you know, portfolio decisions about how we can serve medical need in the best way. We want to stay, you know, in the business of providing new therapeutics for the future.
Our investors require that of us. I think society wants a Pfizer to be doing what we do in 20 years. We make portfolio management decisions. InPfizer decided to re-enter the antibiotic market and bought several drugs under development. Like other large pharmaceuticals, though, it is still not investing in research.
There is an increasing recognition that antibiotics are not a good thing to run off a pure capitalistic market, OK. In Washington, the federal government has been ramping up its involvement in the superbug fight.
Two years ago, the Obama administration unveiled a national plan coordinated by the Department of Health and Human Services. The point person for the effort now is Christopher Jones.
Under the National Action Plan for Combatting Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, which was released inwe now have an overarching framework and structure for addressing this issue across the federal government. We have a plan. We have a plan that has specific actions that are being worked on every single day.
For a long time, people have been warning that the pipeline of new antibiotics is running dry. I think the next phase, as we start to think about products that really show promise in early phases, is, how do we continue to support their development?
But some say the government should be playing a larger role. Is there more that needs to be done?
Where we need to focus on now is using less antibiotics. We need to create policies and regulations. If we publicly reported antibiotic use, attach requirements to hospitals you have to report, that public shaming effect will drive antibiotic use down. What would be the significance and the impact of new budget reductions in antibiotic resistance? I think the gains that we have made have been largely because of investment.
Last year, the warnings became even more dire. Drug-resistant bacterial infections are on track to kill more people than cancer. Bysuperbugs could kill 10 million people a year.
Now we are seeing bacteria that are resistant to the absolute last stop on the train, Colistin. And so for those patients, there are no options left. A year after the outbreak, a young man came to the hospital because of complications from a bone marrow transplant. While he was there, he contracted KPC and died, the seventh victim of the outbreak.
So this organism and organisms like this are going to be with us until the cows come home, and we have to learn how to deal with them. We have to change our culture in the hospital. KPC has been found in hospitals in all but two states.
As for David Ricci, it took three surgeries and another round of highly toxic antibiotics before doctors believed they had removed all the NDM-1 from his leg. So far, Ricci has remained healthy, though not entirely free from the fear of NDM You know, my doctors were pretty straightforward with me. They were very honest and said, you know, there is a good chance that this infection might not go away. Might not ever go away? NDM-1 has now spread to at least 70 countries, and here in the U.
So David was actually sort of a harbinger of something to come. So there are entire continents that have this major problem, public health problem, already.
David was simply a sample of that population and new to us. That globalization, that mobility is going on now. This is already here. All right, Addie, let there be light. This is the day that the Lord has made. Addie Rerecich was finally able to return home.
Yeah, but its, like, not fun. Let there be no light whatsoever. It was like bringing home a premature baby. We brought home monitors. So how are you doing now? Nothing seems out of whack right now. I look pretty much like I did before. I have all my friends back. She has to take a handful of pills twice a day. We have to worry constantly about, you know, picking up a bacteria or a virus. And every year after that, the risks just go up. It happened to Addie. It could happen to anybody.
It could happen to your next-door neighbor. It could happen to your child.