SAGE Books - Close Relationships: A Sourcebook
Start by marking “King and Maxwell (Sean King & Michelle Maxwell, #6)” as Want to Read: (Sean King & Michelle Maxwell #6) David Baldacci brings back Sean King and Michelle Maxwell-former Secret Service agents turned private investigators, featured in the hit TNT TV series King. Buy King and Maxwell Main Market by David Baldacci (ISBN: ) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible. Buy First Family (King & Maxwell) Reprint by David Baldacci (ISBN: Start reading First Family (King and Maxwell Book 4) on your Kindle in under a minute. # in Books > University Textbooks > Communication & Journalism; # in . her demons and she and Sean go to the next level of their ' relationship'.
But their investigation is derailed when Sean and Michelle find Bergin murdered on a highway in New England.
King and Maxwell uncover a government program which uses analysts to examine the combined intelligence government channels. Roy was the top such analyst, King and Maxwell are aided by Roys half sister, a former spy. The trio uncover a conspiracy by the Secretary of Homeland Security to shut down the program and have Roy executed, the novel ends with Michelle waking from a coma after the final battle and Sean realizing how much their relationship meant to him.
Dark hair, attractive, five feet ten inches tall, an Olympic medalist in rowing, Sean King, Also an ex-Secret Service agent, Sean King is in his forties, six feet two, and handsome. King and Maxwells relationship is portrayed as mostly platonic 8. This is the sixth and final installment in the King and Maxwell book series, the book was initially published on November 19, by Grand Central Publishing.
Paperback — A paperback is a type of book characterized by a thick paper or paperboard cover, and often held together with glue rather than stitches or staples. In contrast, hardcover or hardback books are bound with cardboard covered with cloth, inexpensive books bound in paper have existed since at least the 19th century in such forms as pamphlets, yellowbacks, dime novels, and airport novels.
Modern paperbacks can be differentiated by size, in the US there are mass-market paperbacks and larger, more durable trade paperbacks. In the UK, there are A-format, B-format, and the largest C-format sizes, Paperback editions of books are issued when a publisher decides to release a book in a low-cost format.
Cheaper, lower quality paper, glued bindings, and the lack of a cover may contribute to the lower cost of paperbacks.
Paperbacks can be the medium when a book is not expected to be a major seller or where the publisher wishes to release a book without putting forth a large investment. Examples include many novels, and newer editions or reprintings of older books, first editions of many modern books, especially genre fiction, are issued in paperback.
King and Maxwell by David Baldacci
Best-selling books, on the hand, may maintain sales in hardcover for an extended period in order to reap the greater profits that the hardcovers provide. These paper bound volumes were offered for sale at a fraction of the historic cost of a book, the Routledges Railway Library series of paperbacks remained in print untiland offered the traveling public 1, unique titles. The German-language market also supported examples of cheap books, Bernhard Tauchnitz started the Collection of British.
These inexpensive, paperbound editions, a precursor to mass-market paperbacks. Reclam published Shakespeare in this format from October and went on to pioneer the mass-market paper-bound Universal-Bibliothek series from 10 Novemberthe German publisher Albatross Books revised the 20th-century mass-market paperback format inbut the approach of World War II cut the experiment short.How to Talk to Anyone: 92 Little Tricks for Big Success in Relationships Audiobook Part 2
He purchased paperback rights from publishers, ordered large print runs to keep prices low. Booksellers were initially reluctant to buy his books, but when Woolworths placed a large order, after that initial success, booksellers showed more willingness to stock paperbacks, and the name Penguin became closely associated with the word paperback. InRobert de Graaf issued a similar line in the United States, the term pocket book became synonymous with paperback in English-speaking North America.
In French, the term livre de poche was used and is still in use today, de Graaf, like Lane, negotiated paperback rights from other publishers, and produced many runs. His practices contrasted with those of Lane by his adoption of illustrated covers aimed at the North American market, in order to reach an even broader market than Lane, he used distribution networks of newspapers and magazines, which had a lengthy history of being aimed at mass audiences The series was canceled on September 20, King now runs a private detective agency with his partner Michelle Maxwell, and their Assistant, Edgar.
The shows opening features a flashback of Ritters shooting. Showing of 35 next show all Synopsis: Sean and Michelle find a young man running down the road in a storm.
They find that he's been told that his father was KIA; however, this wasn't true. They find that his father is being used as a scapegoat; they must clear the father, protect the son, and save the president. This was a nicely complicated story that once again points out the weaknesses in the different alphabet groups assigned to protect the country.
- The power of good communication
- Close Relationships: A Sourcebook
- King and Maxwell (book series)
DrLed Sep 4, mystery current day — plot for old revenge — son trying to find father MIA — DOA — secret mission to Afghanistan — Alhopiket City — all agencies — good no gov't agen trusts another "Tyler Wingo" — many computer geeks? It seems at first like a simple, tragic story. Tyler Wingo, a teenage boy, learns the awful news that his father, a soldier, was killed in action in Afghanistan.
Then the extraordinary happens: Tyler receives a communication from his father. Tyler hires Sean and Michelle to solve the mystery surrounding his father. It also is a feature of contemporary psychology that many believe is hindering psychology's progress. For example, Lenzeran influential translator of portions of Comte's writings, states, The triumph of the positive spirit consists in the reduction of quality to quantity in all realms of existence—in the realm of society and man as well as in the realm of nature—and the further reduction of quantity of ever larger and more abstract formulations of the relations that obtain between abstract quantities.
He berated those who contended that mathematics offered the only certain knowledge. He warned of the abuse of the calculus of probability—statistics—in physics, chemistry, biology, and sociology. The complexity, diversity, and variability of biological and especially social phenomena precluded their ever being expressed in mathematical equations. In his later writings, he railed against the mathematicians and demoted mathematics from its preeminent place as the model of deductive science replacing it with sociology.
What difference does all this make? Each relationship scholar has another place of employment, usually in his or her discipline of origin and degree, and that discipline, one can be sure, subscribes to distorted positivist dogma—to a philosophy of science and to methodologies that, ironically, the father of positivism would view as ill suited to the subject matter of relationship science.
Comte's views of more than a century ago have been so widely embraced in nearly all branches of knowledge that, at the millennium, quantitative method is believed to be de rigueur for any endeavor that aspires to achieve the status of the other sciences Berscheid, Then again, he might not be.
At the very least, he would be startled. Most people would predict that what would startle Comte would be the next chapter in this part of the sourcebook: It certainly is true that Comte's first disciples would have been displeased.
Comte's initial view that mathematics was the most essential block in the foundation of science was controversial at the time, to say the least, and his disciples were in the minority.
After welcoming the new publication, James writes, The programme of [Ribot's] review is Catholic enough. Kantians and inheritors of Cousin may contribute to its columns on the same terms as Comtists and experimentalists—individual responsibility namely, and the obligation of saying something novel.
Would he, as well, view the increasing popularity of qualitative methods and their presentation in this sourcebook as a step backward for relationship science? A good guess is that, unlike his disciples then and now, Comte himself would not have been surprised to see such a chapter in a sourcebook devoted to relationships. It has escaped popular notice that, throughout his writings, Comte warned against the premature application of mathematics in the sciences dealing with more complex phenomena: Thus, qualitative researchers often undertake their studies in an effort to change society, not simply to describe society's present condition.
Another neglected fact in contemporary understandings of positivism is that the most consistent theme throughout Comte's writings was not his insistence on quantification; instead, it was his belief that the aim of the pursuit of knowledge is not knowledge for the sake of knowledge but rather knowledge to improve society and the human condition.
One cannot leave the chapter on qualitative methods without making one more observation. Quantification undoubtedly will continue its regency.
King and Maxwell
The problem this presents for relationship scholars is that, as noted previously, they must satisfy their colleagues and employers who revere mutilated positivism so much so that it has pervaded even the humanities, which threaten to become lesser branches of the social and behavioral sciences; for example, scholars in English literature and history who count, aggregate, and statistically analyze are highly rewarded by their employers to the detriment and disgust of their more traditional peers.
Our temptation to highlight both quantification and instrumentation in the study of relationships is heightened not only by our disciplinary colleagues and employers but also by our eagerness to gain public acceptance of relationship science.
Gottman, of course, has been in the vanguard of developing and applying quantitative methods to phenomena that not so long ago were believed to be resistant to such treatment, and his successes in quantifying many important relationship behaviors and subjecting them to statistical analysis are widely admired among relationship scholars. The magazine illustrated the article with a photo of a woman and a man seated facing each other, each hooked up to more wires and instruments than would be two astronauts on their way to Mars.
Such illustrations no doubt enhance our scientific reputation with the public, even though they are not representative of relationship research methodology—nor are they ever likely to be.
Whereas relationship science is dependent on the foundation of knowledge provided by the other disciplines with which it interfaces, not only have most of those disciplines not yet reached maturity, but each is severely potholed with investigative domains still in their infancy. When the needed building block is weak, the relationship scholar, before moving ahead to pursue the relationship problem of interest, must turn back to shore up the foundation.
That is precisely what Milardo and Helms-Erikson do in this chapter. They attempt to clarify definitional and conceptual confusions that trouble the social network field. In so doing, they reveal to those of us who have been puzzled by the neglect of the social environment by relationship scholars e. Andrew Collins and Brett Laursen.
The latter title is especially descriptive, for Collins and Laursen attempt to trace the appearance, disappearance, and transmogrified reappearance of themes that mark the adolescent's relationship world, a task so difficult that many readers will leave the chapter thankful that researchers other than themselves have undertaken it. Before reaching old age, however, most people marry and some divorce and marry again. Steil empirically documents the unfairness of spousal division of household labor and treats the question of why so many wives appear to be subjectively content with their objectively inequitable circumstances.